Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sitab Ali vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24525 of 2018 Petitioner :- Sitab Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ikram Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing counsel has appeared for the respondents.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a direction to respondent no. 3 District Magistrate to take strict action against the third parties who are creating interference in running of the Mosque and Dargah.
The petition has not been filed on behalf of any Wakf or mutvalli of Mosque or Dargah. The writ petition filed by the petitioner in his personal capacity is not maintainable, as the petitioner is not a person aggrieved in any manner.
The writ petition is mis-conceived and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.7.2018 SKS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sitab Ali vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 July, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Ikram Ahmad