IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR MFA NO.2120 OF 2016 c/w MFA NO.2119 OF 2016 (CPC) BETWEEN:
1. Siri Shree Daughter of Late HC Srinivasa Aged about 29 years 2. Samrudda Daughter of Late HC Srinivasa Aged about 27 years 3. Harsha Son of Late HC Srinivasa Aged about 25 years All are residing at #1209 3rd Cross, Ashoka Nagara Mahila Seva Samaja Road Mandya-571 401. …Appellants (By Sri. Y.T. Abhinay, Advocate) AND:
1. KL Asha Wife of Late HC Srinivasa Aged about 54 years And residing at #1209 3rd Cross, Ashoka Nagara Mahila Seva Samaja Road Mandya-571 401.
2. Mangalamma Wife of Dr. N. Lingaiah Aged about 71 years And residing at No. 602 Dr quarters, General Hospital Road Mandya-571 401.
3. Jayamma Wife of Late Muthaiah Aged about 68 years And residing at #1510 6th Cross, Asoka Nagara Mandya-571 401.
4. Sarojamma Wife of Dr Late Ramakrishna Aged about 66 years And residing at Govindappa Street, Srirangapatna Srirangapatna Taluk-571 401.
5. Manjulamma Wife of Dr Bore Gowda Aged about 64 years And residing at Kalpavriksha Farm AG Colony, KM Doddi Maddur Taluk-571 401.
6. Shakuntalamma Wife of Basave Gowda Aged about 62 years And residing at 29th Cross T Block, Jayanagara Bengaluru-560 011.
7. TH Shashikala Wife of MN Sampath Kumar Aged Major And residing at #1771 6th Cross, Christian Colony Mandya-571 401.
8. Surya Kumari Wife of MS Mohan Aged Major And residing at Mahaveera Nilaya Ramana Bayalu Banavasi Naki Road, Sirasi Sirasi Taluk, North Canara-581 401.
9. Dr ML Venkatesha Son of Late Lingaiah Aged about 47 years And residing at Sharada Nilaya 1203, Mahila Seva Samaja Road Mandya-571 401. …Respondents (By Sri. Kiran.J, Advocate for C/R9.) These Miscellaneous First Appeals are filed under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of CPC, against the order dated 11.3.2016 passed on I.A.No.10 in O.S.No.51/2012 on the file of the 2nd Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Mandya, dismissing the I.A.No.10 U/O. 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC.
These appeals coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants and respondents are absent. No representation.
In view of the office note, the appeal does not survive for consideration.
Accordingly, the miscellaneous first appeal is dismissed, as the same has become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE SSD