IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S. PATIL WRIT PETITION No.14633/2014 AND WRIT PETITION Nos.16549-16550/2014 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN:
Smt. Siri S Raju W/o S Raju Aged about 47 years, No.2215, 4th A Cross, RPC Layout, Vijayanagara 2nd Stage, Bengaluru-560 040 …Petitioner (By Sri. Venkatesh T.S., Advocate) AND:
1. State of Karnataka Represented by its Secretary Urban Development Department Multistoried Building Bengaluru – 560 001 2. Bangalore Development Authority T Chowdaiah Road Kumara Park West Bangalore 560 020 Represented by its Commissioner ...Respondents (By Sri Vijayakumar A Patil, AGA for R-1) (By Sri. C.R. Gopalaswamy-Adv. for R2) These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to declare that the scheme called “Chandra Layout” in respect of item No.1 to 3 of schedule properties situated at Kempapura Agrahara Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk vide preliminary notification dated 30.7.1977 issued by R-2 (Annex-A) and Final Notification dated 10.5.1978 issued by the R-1 (Annex- B) are lapsed under Section 27 of the Bangalore Development Authorities Act and grant all consequential relief/s thereto and to declare further that the acquisition proceedings in respect of item No.1 to 3 of schedule properties situated at Kempapura Agrahara village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk vide preliminary notification dated 30.7.1977 issued by the R-2(Annex-A and final notification dated 10.5.1978 issued by the R-1(Annex-B) are lapsed under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and grant all consequential relief/s thereto.
These writ petitions coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R Petitioner has filed a Memo seeking to withdraw the Writ petitions.
Placing the Memo on record, Writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE psg*