Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sintu @ Seetu vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|13 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12472 of 2021 Applicant :- Sintu @ Seetu Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Case called out in the revised call.
None appears to press this anticipatory bail application on behalf of the applicant.
This matter relates to Section 3(1)(Da) of Gangsters Act, this anticipatory bail application is not maintainable in the light of Section 438(6) Cr.P.C. (U.P.Amendment Act) and accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is hereby dismissed as not maintainable.
Order Date :- 13.8.2021 Abhishek Sri.
Digitally signed by RAHUL CHATURVEDI Date: 2021.08.16 10:44:54 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sintu @ Seetu vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
13 August, 2021
Judges
  • Rahul Chaturvedi
Advocates
  • Vinod Kumar Srivastava