Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Singhasan Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1968 of 2005 Petitioner :- Singhasan Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- G.M. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vashistha Tiwari
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press the writ petition. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 30.11.2004 and order dated 6.1.2005 passed by the Chairman Nagar Palika Parishad Deoria.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of directing the respondents not to interfere in the functioning of the petitioner as pump attendant and pay him regular salary with consequential benefits."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 Ravi Prakash
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Singhasan Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • G M Tripathi