IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.22454/2017 (GM-TEN-PIL) BETWEEN:
SILICON EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE SOCIETY NO.33/34, 6TH CROSS VINAYAKANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 030 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT A.SAMAD KHAN ...PETITIONER (BY SRI NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. VICE CHANCELLOR RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 4TH ‘T’ BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 041 2. REGISTRAR RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 4TH ‘T’ BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 041 3. REGISTRAR (EVALUATION) RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 4TH ‘T’ BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 041 4. FINANCE OFFICER RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES 4TH ‘T’ BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 041 5. NATIONAL INFORMATICS CENTER (NIC) KARNATAKA STATE UNIT 6TH & 7TH FLOOR MINI TOWER, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE – 560 001 6. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT (MEDICAL EDUCATION) M.S.BUILDING, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE – 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI S.VIJAYA SHANKAR, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI N.K.RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4; SRI VIVEK HOLLA, HCGP FOR R6; R5 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 13.02.2017 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AT ANNEXURE-B.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Ag.CJ (Oral):
1. This writ petition is filed as a cause in public interest.
2. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Vijaya Shankar S., learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri N.K.Ramesh, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to show that the impugned tender notification (Annexure-B) issued by the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences is in contravention of any provision of rule, regulation or law. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. In view of dismissal of the writ petition, I.A.No.2/2017 does not survive for consideration; it stands disposed of accordingly.
Petition dismissed.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE hkh.