Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Signature Infrastructure Company A Partnership vs M/S Ethan A Partnership Firm

High Court Of Karnataka|30 August, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NO.62574 OF 2016 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN M/S SIGNATURE INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 5AC 952, HRBR I BLOCK, BANGALORE 560043, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI. S. GOPALRISHNAN (By SRI. S. SHAKER SHETTY, ADV.) AND M/S. ETHAN A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO 159, 18TH ‘A’ MAIN, HAL II STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560038, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MR. KRISHNAKUMAR T.
... PETITIONER.
... RESPONDENT.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL COURT (COURT HALL NO.21) BENGALURU TO DISPOSE OF THE EXECUTION PETITION (EXECUTION NO. 25027/2016 WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF DISPOSAL OF ORDERS IN THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Petitioner’s counsel has filed a memo stating that the respondent has delivered vacant possession of the subject premises to the petitioner pursuant to a settlement recorded in Execution No.25027/2016 before the City Civil Court, Mayo Hall, Bengaluru and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed.
Memo is perused. Writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/- JUDGE KS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Signature Infrastructure Company A Partnership vs M/S Ethan A Partnership Firm

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
30 August, 2017
Judges
  • B V Nagarathna