Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sigandhuru Chowdeshwari Recreation Association

High Court Of Karnataka|31 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION No.14170 OF 2019 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
Sigandhuru Chowdeshwari Recreation Association, No.368, Vijaya Bank Colony, D.C. Halli Road, Bengaluru-560 078. Rep. by its President V. Shiva S/o Venkataramanappa, Aged about 42 years. ... Petitioner (By Sri. Shankar M. Naik, Advocate) AND:
1. The Government of Karnataka, Home Department, Vidhana Soudha, Bengaluru-560 001. By its Secretary.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Infantry Road, Bengaluru-560 001.
3. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Bengaluru South Division, Bengaluru-560 076.
4. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Tilak Nagar, Bengaluru-560 041.
5. Inspector of Police, Mico Layout, Bengaluru-560 076.
6. Assistant Commissioner of Police, CCB Police Station, N.T. Pet, Bengaluru-560 002. ... Respondents (By Sri. B. Balakrishna, AGA) This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents not to insist upon the petitioner to obtain the license to carry on lawful activities in the premises of the petitioners Association, either under the Police Act, or under the provisions of licensing and controlling of places of public amusement order and not to interfere in the play of skill oriented games and like skill, fantastic-3, roulette, six colour games, indoor and outdoor games, like snooker, billiards, pool game, chess, rummy, poker, carom, dart, wall ball skill and skill games etc., which are the games of skill as held by this Hon’ble Court in various writ petitions.
This petition coming on for Orders, this day, the Court made the following:-
O R D E R Sri. Shankar M. Naik, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. B. Balakrishna, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to insist upon the petitioner to obtain the license to carry on lawful activities in the premises of the petitioner’s Association, either under the Police Act, or under the provisions of Licensing and Controlling of places of public Amusement order and not to interfere in the play of skill oriented games and like skill, fantastic-3, Roulette, Six colour games, indoor and outdoor games like snooker, billiards, pool game, chess, rummy, poker, carom, dart wall ball skill and skill games etc., which are the games of skill as held by this Court in various writ petitions.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by an order dated 19.10.2016 in Review Petition No.200029/2016.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and with a view to maintain parity, writ petition is disposed of with the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein game(s) is / are played by the members. The CC TV footage of atleast prior 15 days’ period shall be made available by the petitioner to the jurisdictional police, as and when called upon to do so.
(ii) The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the member(s), when called upon by the concerned police, during the raid(s), survelliance, etc.
(iii) The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of Ss.2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not permit any game(s) of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The member(s) shall not be allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played.
(iv) The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the member(s). If the jurisdictional police find the game(s) played is/are contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against the petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.
(v) The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner’s premises.
(vi) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner’s – Club/Association.
(vii) It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the member(s) of the petitioner is/are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities.
No order as to costs.
Sd/- JUDGE BMC/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sigandhuru Chowdeshwari Recreation Association

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
31 July, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe