Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Siddaraju And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|29 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5537 OF 2015 BETWEEN:
1. SIDDARAJU S/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA, AGED 52 YEARS, R/AT BETTADAHALASURU, 2. VINAY S/O SIDDARAJU DOING M.S. IN LONDON 3. VIJAY S/O SIDDARAJU ENGINEERING GRADUATE, 4. LALITHA W/O SIDDARJU AGED 46 YEARS, 5. SAVITHRAMMA W/O KENCHEGOWDA AGED 50 YEARS, 6. PUTTAMADEGOWDA S/O CHIKKAMADEGOWDA AGED 60 YEARS, 7. SIDDARAJU @ SIDDU S/O KENCHEGOWDA AGED 50 YEARS, 8. RAJU S/O PUTTAMADIAH, AGED 40 YEARS, 9. KARIYAPPA S/O MARIGOWDA, AGED 55 YEARS, 10. JYOTHI W/O PUTTA ARASEGOWDA, AGED 35 YEARS, 11. KENCHEGOWDA S/O REVEGOWDA, AGED 60 YEARS, PETITIONER NOS. 1 TO 11 ARE R/AT BETTADAHALASURU, KODIHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT PIN 562119 ... PETITIONERS (SRI: SIDDARAJU AND OTHER PETITIONERS-ABSENT) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KODIHALLI POLICE STATION (KANAKAPURA) REPRESENTED BY S P P HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BANGALORE 560001 2. RAJU S/O SHOMBALINGASHETTI, AGED 29 YEARS, B KODIHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: VIJAYAKUMAR MAJAGE, ADDL SPP FOR R1; R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED PURSUANT TO COMPLIANT FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN C.C.No.555/2014 NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA, RAMANAGARAM FOR OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 143, 504, 506 R/W SEC.149 OF I.P.C.
THIS CRL.P IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo of retirement. Copy of the notice issued to petitioners along with postal acknowledgment for having served copy of the petition are produced. Memo is placed on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners’ is permitted to retire.
Petitioners are absent. No arrangements are made to represent the petitioners before the Court.
Hence, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE *mn/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Siddaraju And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
29 July, 2019
Judges
  • John Michael Cunha