IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 1601 OF 2017 (PAR) Between:
1. SMT SIDDAMMA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS W/O VENKATARAVANA @ VENKATARAVANA BHOVI 2. SRI VENKATARAVANA @ VENKATARAVANA BHOVI AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O LATE RAMANNA, BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF LAKSHMIDEVI KOTE VILLAGE AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI, CHINTHAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. R. CHANDRANNA, ADVOCATE) And:
1. SMT DODDAVENKATAMMA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS D/O LATE NARAYANA BHOVI, RESIDENT OF GURUMAPALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKALANERAPUR HOBLI, CHINTHAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT 2. SMT CHIKKAVENKATAMMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS D/O LATE NARAYANA BHOVI W/O KRISHNAPPA, R/O GUDISEPALLI VILLAGE, CHINTHAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT ... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.11.2010 MADE IN O.S.NO.51/2001 BY THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT CHINTHAMANI AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.02.2012 MADE IN R.A.NO.3/2011 BY THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE AT CHIKKABALLAPUR INSOFAR AS THEY RELATE TO GRANTING OF DECREE FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION OF THE SHARE OF THE RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 IN ITEM NOS.1 TO 3 OF THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTIES.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment None appears for the appellants. This Court on 03.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this preemptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Judge SA Ct:sr