IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.43045 OF 2016 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:
SMT. SHYLA R @ REKHA W/O. SRI NANDAN GIRI K. D/O. SRI RAJU AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.3622 16TH CROSS NAGESHWARA LAYOUT NEAR KALAMANDIRA NANJUNGUD-571 303 MYSURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI NAGESH KUMAR T.K., ADV. - ABSENT) AND:
SHRI NANDAN GIRI K. S/O. SRI KITTAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.3695 III MAIN, III CROSS SRIKANTAPURI EXTENSION NANJANGUD TOWN-571 301.
MYSURU DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI ROSHAN G.R. JAIN, ADV. FOR SRI RUPESH KUMAR S., ADV. FOR C/R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE-F DATED: 02.06.2016 PASSED BY THE JUDGE AT PRINCIPAL I ADDITIONAL FAMILY COURT, MYSURU IN MC.NO.314/2013 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R None appear for the petitioner.
Sri Roshan G.R. Jain, learned counsel for Sri Rupesh Kumar S., learned counsel for caveator- respondent No.1.
2. Heard the learned counsel for respondent on the question of admission and perused the records.
3. In this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the order dated 02.06.2016 passed by the I Additional Family Court, Mysuru.
4. When the matter was taken up for consideration today, learned counsel for the respondent has filed a memo dated 19.02.2019 which is taken on record. In the aforesaid memo, it is stated that the proceeding in M.C.No.314/2013 has been terminated and the aforesaid case has been allowed vide judgment and decree dated 28.08.2018.
6. Since, the main proceeding itself has been decided, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE ST