Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Shyam And Others vs State By Its Station

High Court Of Karnataka|14 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO. 8061/2018 BETWEEN 1. SHYAM S/O. RAMDHARI AGED 28 YEARS R/AT. NO. 15 PUNCH VALMIKI SWAMY VILLAGE CHODASANDRA VILLAGE PANCHAYATH, RANCHI DISTRICT HARIYANA STATE 2. RAJU @ RAJESH RAI S/O. RAJESH AGED 22 YEARS MIRKA VILLAGE DARJLING DISTRICT WEST BENGAL STATE ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJASHEKARA R. V, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND STATE BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER SIDDAPURA POLICE BENGALURU – 560 034 REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU – 560 001 … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ROHITH B J., HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN CR.NO.163/2018 REGISTERED BY SIDDAPURA POLICE STATION, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/Ss. 457 AND 380 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The matter having been passed over in the Morning Session, when called in the Afternoon Session, neither the petitioners nor their counsel present before the Court.
The order sheet discloses that, six opportunities have been granted to comply with the office objections. But, so far the office objections have not been complied with. This indicates that, the petitioners have no interest to prosecute the case. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE KGR*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shyam And Others vs State By Its Station

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
14 October, 2019
Judges
  • K N Phaneendra