Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Shyam Narayan Shukla vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7433 of 2018 Petitioner :- Shyam Narayan Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Surat Saroj Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahboob Ahmad
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for State of U.P. and perused the record.
2. Only relief sought by petitioner is that respondent no. 6 constructed bore well for extracting water from it in 'Dark Zone' area, and in this regard subsequent enquiry should have been made. In this regard petitioner made a complaint before respondent no. 2 vide letter dated 28.11.2017.
3. Record shows that bore-well was constructed in February, 2000 and alleged complaint was made in the year 2017, i.e. after 17 years.
4. We find no reason for any such enquiry in the matter as prayed for after such a long time. However, petitioner may avail remedy in common law, if so advised, and are available.
5. Dismissed.
Order Date :- 28.2.2018 A. Verma
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shyam Narayan Shukla vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Ram Surat Saroj