Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Shyam Bihari vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 13410 of 2018 Petitioner :- Shyam Bihari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Mohan Srivastava,Rishi Kapoor Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,M.N. Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
1. Petitioner is challenging his non promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer. Learned counsel for petitioner could not dispute that in this regard, petitioner has a statutory alternative remedy by filing Claim Petition before U.P. Public Services Tribunal under Section 4 of U.P. Public Services (Tribunal) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 1976”). He also could not advance any substantive argument so as to persuade us not to relegate the petitioner to avail the aforesaid statutory alternative remedy.
2. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 31.5.2018 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shyam Bihari vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Hari Mohan Srivastava Rishi Kapoor