Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 1310 of 2004 Appellant :- Shyam Bahadur Respondent :- Bank Of Baroda And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Anand Kumar Sinha,Rakesh Pande Counsel for Respondent :- V.B. Singh,Ashok Kumar Lal,C.S.C.,Uday Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1. It is contended that appellant was Daftari and has no duty to receive money, which has been deposited by customer in Bank concerned. Hence, allegation levelled against appellant to misappropriate by receiving money from customer is patently false. Neither appellant has been assigned supposed to discharge such duty nor he is competent to receive money as Daftri from customer. Daftari is a Class IV employee.
2. Learned Counsel for appellant when questioned seeks time to produce relevant provisions, showing duty of Daftri, before the Court.
3. List after two weeks.
Order Date :- 30.4.2019 I.A.Siddiqui