Court No. - 10
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4680 of 2020 Petitioner :- Shukla Devi @ Sukra Devi Respondent :- Sanjay Kumar Saroj And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Srivastava,Shitala Sahay Srivastav Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice need not be issued to respondents.
After some arguments counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer only to the effect to direct the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Jaunpur to decide the application 6 C filed in Case No. 1015 of 2020 (Shukla Devi vs. Sanjay and another) within stipulated period.
It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that apart from the aforesaid case, an application 6C has also preferred by him for grant of interim protection. It is argued that the interim protection is urgently required. It is argued that large number of dates were fixed in the matter but till date no final decision has been taken on the same.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and without entering into merits of the case, the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is disposed of directing the Civil Judge (Junior Division) City Jaunpur to pass appropriate orders on the application 6 C filed by the petitioner on the next date fixed. In case, on the said date on account of any reason, the said application could not decide, the Civil Judge (Junior Division), City Jaunpur will decide the same expeditiously and preferably within a period of 15 days thereafter.
Order Date :- 13.1.2021 Swati