Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Shree Ram Pandey vs State Of U.P., Thru. Secretary, ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Vedpal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate.
Under challenge in the instant writ petition is the FIR. relating to Case Crime No.303 of 2010 under Sections 304, 504,506,427 I.P.C. and 3(2) (v) of SC & ST Act, Police Station Khairabad, District Sitapur.
We have gone through the contents of the FIR. Since it discloses commission of cognizable offence as such the same cannot be quashed.
However, seeing that there is no mention in the FIR that victim was manhandlled/assaultted in any manner by the petitioner that the post mortem report states that the deceased died due to rupture of liver, we hereby direct that the petitioner shall not be arrrested in the aforesaid case crime number unless and untill cogent and reliable evidence comes forward against him provided he cooperates with the investigation, which shall go on.
Order Date :- 22.6.2010 Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shree Ram Pandey vs State Of U.P., Thru. Secretary, ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 June, 2010