IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09th DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO.6662/2016 (GM-RES) Between:
Shree Gavisiddeshwara Minerals, (A Registered Partnership firm) Represented by its Managing Partner, M/s. BMM Ispat Ltd., (A Company registered under the Companies Act) By its Managing Director, Mr.Dinesh Kumar Singhi, S/o. Late Udaichand Singhi Aged about 45 years, Unit No.101, 1st Floor, “Pride Elite” No.10, Museum Road, Bengaluru – 560 001. ... Petitioner (By Sri. K. Dhiraj Kumar, Advocate) And 1. The State Bank of Hyderabad, Represented by its Deputy General Manager, Industrial Finance Branch, Sheriff House 1st Floor, No.85, Richmond Road, Bengaluru – 560 025.
2. Mr. M. Srinivasalu, S/o. Sri. Venkataswami, Aged about 60 years, R/o. Srinivasa Nilayam, No.168-C, 18th Ward, Near Water buster, 3rd Cross, Gandhinagar, Ballari – 583 102.
3. Mr. A. Kireeti, S/o. Sri. D. R. Ratnakar, Aged about 54 years, R/o. Basaveshwar Circle, Sir. M. V. Road, Shivamogga – 577 201.
4. Mr. K. Gopalkrishna Rao, S/o. Sri. Katta Rajeeva, Aged about 68 years, R/o. Bunder Road, Gangolli, Udupi – 575 216.
5. Mr. H. E. Panduranga, S/o. Sri. Late H. S. Eshwarappa, Aged about 44 years, R/o. No.473, Gavisiddeshwara Nilaya, 8th Main, 4th Cross, Ta.Ra.Su. Road, Hanumantha Nagar, Bangalore – 560 050.
6. Mr. N. Anand Rao, S/o. Late Sri. N. Rangaiah, Aged about 45 years, R/o. Seven Hills, Flot No.9, Gandhinagar, Ballari – 583 201. ... Respondents (By Sri. J.D.Ramakrishna Rao, Advocate for R1; Sri. L.M.Chidanandayya, Advocate for R2 to R5 & Notice served on R6) This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to quash the communication dtd: 01.02.2016 issued by R1 the copy of the which is produced at Annexure – H and etc., This writ petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group this day, the court made the following:-
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the petition has become infructuous and therefore, the petition be dismissed.
2. Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/- JUDGE KA/-