Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11090 of 2018 Applicant :- Shravan Kumar Yadav @ Golu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sabita,Ritesh Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
This bail application has been moved seeking bail in Case Crime No. 90 of 2017 under Section 3 (1) of U.P. Gangesters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Laxa, District Varanasi, during the pendency of trial.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated. In gang chart, enclosed at page-23 of the paper book, three criminal cases i.e. (1) Case Crime No. 50 of 2017, under Sections 457, 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Laxa, District Varanasi, (2) Case Crime No.
77 of 2017 under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Laxa, District Varanasi and (3) 79 of 2017 under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Laxa District Varanasi are shown against the applicant, on the basis of which present case has been imposed against the applicant. In all the aforesaid cases he has been granted bail. The applicant is not involved in other criminal case other than the present case. The applicant is absolutely innocent and is languishing in jail since 22nd August, 2018. In case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra learned A.G.A. opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but has not controverted the aforesaid facts.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
In the light of the aforesaid arguments, looking to the fact of the case and taking into consideration the nature of offence, quantum of punishment and period of detention in jail, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is found to be a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Shravan Kumar Yadav @ Golu involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
(D.K. Singh-I, J.) Order Date :- 27.3.2018 Sushil/-