Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Shourin Poul @ Doli And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14906 of 2021 Applicant :- Shourin Poul @ Doli And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Nitin Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicants, namely, Shourin Poul@ Doli and Vinay Poul in Case Crime No. 08 of 2020, under sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 313 I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S.- Jaithra, District - Etah.
At the very outset, it has been mentioned by learned counsel for the applicants that applicant No. 2 Vinay Poul has already been arrested and the application in support of him has become infructuous.
As such application for anticipatory bail on behalf of applicant No. 2-Vinay Poul is dismissed as infructuous.
In respect of applicant No. 1 Shourin Poul@ Doli it has been pointed out by the learned AGA that instructions have been received and it has been found that the applicant No. 1 has been exonerated during investigation.
As such the application for anticipatory bail on behalf of applicant No. 1-Shourin Poul @ Doli has become infructuous and it is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 24.9.2021 Ankita
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shourin Poul @ Doli And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 September, 2021
Judges
  • Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Advocates
  • Nitin Kumar