Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20686 of 2018 Petitioner :- Shoraab Tyagi And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Vashisth Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard Sri Sunil Vashisth, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 13.07.2018 registered as Case Crime No. 816 of 2018 under Sections 323, 325, 308, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Sardhana, District Meerut.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for quashing of the F.I.R. which discloses cognizable offence.
The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case.
From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out and taking into account the medical examination report of the victim, no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioners.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.) Order Date :- 31.7.2018 S.K.