1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Shoaib @ Babboo vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 October, 2018


Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39187 of 2018 Applicant :- Shoaib @ Babboo Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Yadav,Saroj Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Supplementary affidavit, annexing the bail order, has been filed today, which is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed by the applicant Shoaib @ Babboo seeking bail in Case Crime No. 813 of 2018, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Jewar, District Gautam Buddha Nagar.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that according to the gang-chart, the applicant is said to be involved in two cases and in both the cases, he has already been granted bail and copies of the bail orders have been annexed along with the bail application.
Apart from the aforesaid cases, the applicant is shown to be involved in one more case being Case Crime No. 302 of 2018 under the Arms Act, in which, he has also been granted bail and copy of the bail order has been filed along with the supplementary affidavit. Prospects of conclusion of trial at an early date is very bleak due to heavy dockets.
He has further submitted that the applicant is in jail since 11.04.2018 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means.
On the other hand, learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by learned counsel for the applicant but has submitted that in case, the applicant is released on bail, he will again indulge in anti-social activities and misuse the privilege of bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let the applicant Shoaib @ Babboo be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 12.10.2018 Nadim
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Shoaib @ Babboo vs State Of U P


High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

12 October, 2018
  • Rajiv Gupta
  • Ashok Kumar Yadav Saroj Kumar Dubey