Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.H.Mohammed Noohu vs The Local Planning Authority

Madras High Court|08 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the notice dated 27.02.2017 passed in Na.Ka.No.1495/15 Thi.Oo.Thi.Ku by the first respondent and quash the same, by way of issuing a writ of certiorarified mandamus.
2.Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, has taken notice for the first respondent and Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar, learned counsel, has taken notice for the second respondent.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has contended to the effect that in the impugned notice without following the legal procedure only 24 hours time has been given and under the said circumstances, the present writ petition has been filed for getting the relief sought therein.
4.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent has contended to the effect that already notices in Form No.I and Form No.II have been issued even in the year 2015, but the petitioner has not given any reply and under the said circumstances the impugned notice has been given on 27.02.2017 and therefore the relief sought in the writ petition cannot be granted.
5.It is seen from the records that the impugned notice has been issued under Section 56(2) of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, wherein it is stated to the effect that the petitioner has been directed to stop further construction within a period of 24 hours.
6.Considering the fact that the impugned notice has not been given as contemplated under Section 56 of the said Act, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.
7.In fine, this writ petition is allowed without costs and the impugned notice dated 27.02.2017 issued by the first respondent is quashed. However the first respondent is at liberty to issue fresh notice as contemplated under law. Till the proceeding which is going to be initiated against the petitioner is completed, the petitioner is strictly directed not to continue construction work. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
To
1.The Member Secretary, Local Planning Authority, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Commissioner, Tirunelveli Corporation, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District..
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.H.Mohammed Noohu vs The Local Planning Authority

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
08 March, 2017