1. Petitioner is aggrieved with Ext.P5, which is an order passed in an application for regular permit, Ext.P1. Petitioner, in fact, relies on Ext.P4, the Field Officer's report, to contend that the adjournment made on Ext.P5, is on a mis-apprehension and in fact, the ground for directing modification does not at all exist. Petitioner also asserts that he is not interested in giving a modified proposal. In such circumstances, the RTA is directed to dispose of the application expeditiously in its next meeting.
2. The petitioner submits that he has filed an application for temporary permit at Ext.P6. In the context of the apprehensions expressed in Ext.P5, it may not be proper for this Court to direct issuance of W.P.(C)No.30127 of 2014 -:2:-
temporary permit. The Secretary may consider the application within three weeks, if there is no other legal impediment.
Writ petition is disposed off.
K. Vinod Chandran, Judge.
sl.