Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Shiv Prasad vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30636 of 2003 Petitioner :- Shiv Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kuamr Srivastava,A.S. Diwekar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shiv Nath Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant regular pay scale of permanent salesman from a date prior to date on which such benefit was conferred on salesman enjoying benefit of regular pay scale and junior to the petitioner in the cadre of salesman."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also relief sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shiv Prasad vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 August, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Vinod Kuamr Srivastava A S Diwekar