Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Shiv Nath Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6556 of 2019 Petitioner :- Shiv Nath Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramakant Tiwari,Umesh Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kapil Dev Singh Rathore
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1. Heard Sri Ramakant Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner.
2. The petitioner claims that installation of pole and electrical lines of heavy voltage is causing safety hazards.
3. For redressal of grievance of petitioner remedy is provided under Section 161 of Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 2003").
4. Counsel for petitioner could not raise any substantial argument so as not to relegate the petitioner to avail the said remedy.
5. Dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
6. Sri Kapil Deo Singh Rathore, Advocate appears for Corporation but could not give any reply to the query made by the Court hence could not assist the Court.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 KA
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shiv Nath Pandey vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Ramakant Tiwari Umesh Chandra Tiwari