Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Shiv Murat Singh Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5258 of 2019 Petitioner :- Shiv Murat Singh Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Daya Shanker Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned standing counsel has received instructions and submits that name of the petitioner was not sponsored by any of the authority for gallantry award, further, petitioner has raised this issue after a lapse of 2-1/2 years.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that the second respondent shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law.
In view thereof, on consent, the petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner by reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of certified copy of this order alongwith copy of the writ petition.
It is clarified that the Court has not considered the claim of the petitioner on merits.
Order Date :- 30.4.2019 Mukesh Kr.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shiv Murat Singh Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2019
Judges
  • Suneet Kumar
Advocates
  • Daya Shanker Pandey