Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Shiv Murat Pal vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38828 of 2018 Petitioner :- Shiv Murat Pal Respondent :- State Of U P And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Pratap,Anil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has come to this Court with the allegation that respondents No.6,7 and 8 have encroached upon the pathway whereby the petitioner's igress and ingress to his house has become difficult.
The encroachment is said to be on Chak road. Whether there exists any Chak road or any construction is being raised thereon by respondents No.6,7 and 8 are all questions of fact which cannot be gone into writ jurisdiction. The petitioner, if so advised may approach the competent civil court for redressal of his grievance. The writ petition for the said purpose is not maintainable and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 28.11.2018 VPC (Vivek Varma,J) (Abhinava Upadhya,J)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shiv Murat Pal vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2018
Judges
  • Abhinava Upadhya
Advocates
  • Mahendra Pratap Anil Kumar Srivastava