C.M.Appl.No.144 of 2014 The petitioner sought for review of the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C)No.15708 of 2013 dated 21.6.2013. There is a delay of 255 days in filing the review petition. I have carefully gone through the affidavit accompanying this application explaining the delay. However, I could not find any explanation for the delay. Therefore, there is no need for considering the question whether a sufficient cause has been shown when there is absolute absence of any reason to condone the delay. I have also carefully gone through the directions in the judgment and also the grounds taken up in the review petition. Ground No.(C) in the review petition would reveal that the review petitioners were directed to be given the same benefits as has been ordered to be given to the petitioners in W.P.(C)No.9610 of 2013 as per judgment dated 14.6.2013. That apart, it was made clear in the said judgment that in case of any further grievance for redressal it would be open to the R.P.No.395 of 2014 2 petitioners to approach the State Forest Development Agency. Thus, it is obvious that in fact, on merits also there is no scope for any review of the judgment. For these reasons, I do not think it proper to condone the delay of 255 days in filing the review petition. Therefore, this application is dismissed.
R.P.No.395 of 2014 Consequent to the dismissal of C.M.Appl. No.144 of 2014 this review petition is also dismissed.
Sd/-
C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS