IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1362 OF 2018 (AA) BETWEEN:
M/S NEW SHELTERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS 1. SRI RAVI S/O SRI A.R.SURYANARAYANAN AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS OFFICE AT NO.18, 1ST STREET, ABHIRAMAPURAM CHENNAI-600 018 2. SMT GEETHA VENKITACHALAM W/O SRI VENKITACHALAM AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO.3, SHENOY ROAD CHENNAI-600 034 ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SUKUMARAN.G., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI H.GOPALAKRISHNAN S/O SRI V.R.HARIHARA IYER AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/O NO.23/1 MUNISWAMY ROAD TASKER TOWN BENGALURU-560 051 2. SRI H.VENKATESHWARAN S/O SRI V.R.HARIHARA IYER AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SMT.VASANTHA PARAMESHWARAN W/O SRI.P.S.PARAMESHWARAN AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/O NO.245 (OLD NO.290) 6TH B-CROSS, DOMLUR LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 071 3. SMT VIJAYAM VENKATESHWARAN W/O SRI M.S.VENKATESHWARAN AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/O G-5B, BLOCK 1-A “HIMAGIRI ENCLAVE” KAGGADASAPURA MAIN ROAD C.V.RAMAN NAGAR BENGALURU-560 093 4. SMT VASANTHA PARAMESHWARAN W/O SRI P.S.PARAMESHWARAN AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/O NO.245 (OLD NO.290) 6TH B-CROSS, DOMLUR LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 071 5. SMT SAROJA VENKATESHWARAN W/O SRI K.S.VENKATESHWARAN AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/O NO.35, VENKATARAMANA ROAD R.S.PURAM, COIMBATORE TAMIL NADU. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJA R., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1, R2, R4 & R5) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37(1)(c) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, AGAINST THE AWARD DATED 10.01.2018 PASSED IN A.S.NO.25008/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH-21), DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED U/S 34 R/W SECTION 22 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants submit that a Memo is already filed with the office of this Court on 05.08.2019 seeking dismissal of the appeal as not pressed, and in reiteration of this Memo, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of these submissions, appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
SD/- JUDGE KG