Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sheetal vs U P State Bridge

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 16
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16324 of 2018 Petitioner :- Sheetal Respondent :- U.P. State Bridge, Corporation Ltd. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surjeet Singh Patel,Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Pranjal Mehrotra
Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondents.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner directing the respondents to pay the entire retiral dues along with interest for which he has already made a representation to the respondent no. 2 on 26.05.2018 which is still pending disposal.
Shri Pranjal Mehrotra has no objection if the present petition is decided at the admission stage itself.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 (The Deputy Project Manager, U.P. State Bridge, Construction Unit-1, Lucknow) to consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is filed before him.
Order Date :- 31.7.2018 VR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sheetal vs U P State Bridge

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 July, 2018
Judges
  • S Sangeeta Chandra
Advocates
  • Surjeet Singh Patel Ajay Kumar