Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sheersh Pandey @ Chunmun vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28999 of 2019 Applicant :- Sheersh Pandey @ Chunmun Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Usha Srivastava,Arjit Srivastava,Vinod Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking the quashing of charge sheet dated 08.03.2019 and cognizance order dated 20.04.2019 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 12122 of 2019 (State Vs. Sheersh Pandey), arising out of Case Crime No. 1026 of 2018, under Sections 452, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Naubasta, District- Kanpur, pending in the court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-II, Kanpur Nagar.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
At the very outset learned counsel for the applicant says that he does not want to press the prayer with regard to quashing of the charge-sheet as well as cognizance order. Submission is that applicant wants to appear before the court below and get himself bailed out and in that regard some protective direction may be given.
Heard learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
In the light of the submissions made by the counsel this application so far as it seeks quashing of the charge-sheet and cognizance order, stands dismissed.
However, it is observed that if the bail has not been obtained as yet, the accused may appear before the court below and apply for bail within two weeks from today. The court below shall make an endeavour to decide the bail application, if possible, keeping in view the observations made by the Court in the Full Bench decision of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2004 (57) ALR 290 and also in view of the decision given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).
In the aforesaid period or till the date of appearance of the accused in the court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive measures shall be taken or given effect to.
It is further clarified that this order has been passed only with regard to the accused on behalf of whom application has been moved in this Court.
With the aforesaid observations this application is finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 26.7.2019 P.S.Parihar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sheersh Pandey @ Chunmun vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 July, 2019
Judges
  • Karuna Nand Bajpayee
Advocates
  • Usha Srivastava Arjit Srivastava Vinod Kumar Srivastava