Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3270 of 2019 Revisionist :- Shashi Kumar @ Chhotu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ram Surat Patel,Dharmendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
This criminal revision has been preferred against the judgement and order dated 01.06.2019 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Hamirpur in Maintenance Case No.65 of 2014 (Smt. Vimla Devi and another vs. Shashi Kumar @ Chhotu) u/s 125 Cr.P.C., P.S.-Kurara, District-Hamirpur whereby opposite party no.2 has been awarded Rs.4000/- and opposite party no.2 has been awarded Rs.2000/- per month as maintenance from the date of order.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned A.G.A. Perused the record.
Counsel for the revisionist has not been able to point out any such illegality, impropriety or incorrectness in the impugned order which may persuade this Court to interfere in the same. Impugned order reflects judicial application of mind. Issues were duly framed and the evidence and circumstances were well discussed in the impugned order by the court below. There were clear allegations of committing cruelty upon the wife and she has been grossly neglected and all sort of ill-treatment was inflicted upon her. Rs.6000/- per month has been fixed as maintenance amount which cannot be said to be either excessive or disproportionate in the present days of high price rise. The provisions of Section- 125 of Cr.P.C. are beneficiary in nature and are meant to provide some succour to the neglected wives in order to prevent them from vagrancy and destitution. This Court does not see any such element of perversity which may persuade this court to make any interference in the impugned order. There is no good reason to take a different view in the matter.
The present revision, therefore, stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.8.2019 M. Kumar