Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Shashi Kant vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 27715 of 2018 Petitioner :- Shashi Kant Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Dhama Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
The petitioner claims that he has been working since the year 1995 and despite having work for several years he is not been considered for regularization. The counsel for the respondent has drawn attention to the order dated 13.11.2018 whereby it has been observed that the petitioner is eligible for being considered, however in the absence of adequate sanction posts or vacant post his claim cannot be considered at present.
It is made clear that the claim of the petitioner shall be considered as and when vacant post are available or sanction by the competent authority. The claim of the petitioner shall be considered positively and in accordance with law.
With above directions the writ petition is disposed off.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 C. MANI
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shashi Kant vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Bhatia
Advocates
  • Raj Kumar Dhama