Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11721 of 2002 Petitioner :- Shashi Kant Prajapati Respondent :- Dy. Labour Commissioner U.P. & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- P.C. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 23.2.2000 and 9.11.1998 (Annexure 4 and 5) to the writ petition, passed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2 to treat the petitioner in continuous service and pay him accordingly."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 Siddhant Sahu