Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sharif vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24661 of 2019 Applicant :- Sharif Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Swati Agrawal Srivastava,Dhananjay Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mahendra Singh
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Manvendra Singh, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that identically placed co-accused Rizwan and Ansar have been granted bail by another Bench of this Court on 18.1.2019 and 14.2.2019 vide Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2097 of 2019 and 5204 of 2019. Role assigned to the present applicant is not distinguishable with the present applicant. He further submits that the role of the applicant is not distinguishable with the role of co-accused, therefore, the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. It is next submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 09.05.2019 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant stated that applicant has approached this Court by filing Criminal Misc. Writ Petition but the same was dismissed. The applicant did not surrender thereafter. Since he was absconding and not surrendering before the court, he is not entitled for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, the fact that the identically placed co-accused has already been released on bail by this Court and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Sharif involved in Case Crime No. 142 of 2018, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302/34 IPC, P.S. Kalyanpur, District Fatehpur be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
Order Date :- 24.6.2019 Sachdeva
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sharif vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 June, 2019
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Swati Agrawal Srivastava Dhananjay Singh Yadav