Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Sharafunneesa P.K

High Court Of Kerala|22 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging Ext.P3 proceedings of the second respondent rejecting her application for permission to construct a building in her property. Her application has been rejected for the reason that the property is described as 'nilam' in the Revenue records. 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the ground on which Ext.P3 has been issued is unsustainable. The case of the petitioner is that though the property has been described as paddy field in the Revenue records, at present the same is a house plot or filled up land. The above is evident from Ext.P4 series photographs. Therefore, she seeks the issue of appropriate orders setting aside Ext.P3.
3. Having considered the rival contentions of the contesting parties, it has to be held that Ext.P3 is unsustainable in view of the dictum laid down by this court in Shahanaz -:2:-
W.P.(C) No.611 of 2014
Shukkoor v. Chelannur Grama Panchayat [2009(3) KLT 899] and Praveen v. Land Revenue Commissioner, [2010(2) KLT 617]. It has been held by this Court that it is not the description of a land in the Revenue records that is decisive, but the present condition of the land. If the land has ceased to be a paddy field on the date of coming into force of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, building permit cannot be denied. A perusal of Ext.P3 shows that the above aspect has not been considered. Therefore, Ext.P3 is set aside.
This Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider the application submitted by the petitioner afresh, after conducting an inspection of the land of the petitioner to verify whether the land continues to be a paddy field as described in the Revenue Records and whether the conversion was made before 2008 and thereafter, to pass appropriate orders on the application in accordance with law. Appropriate orders as indicated above shall be passed, as expeditiously as possible and -:3:-
W.P.(C) No.611 of 2014 at any rate within a period of one month of the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE rkc
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sharafunneesa P.K

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
22 November, 2014
Judges
  • K Surendra Mohan
Advocates
  • M Sasindran Sri