Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sharad Srivastava vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 222 of 2019 Appellant :- Sharad Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Akhilesh Kumar Singh,Ram Ji Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant and learned Standing Counsel.
The request of the petitioner-appellant for compassionate appointment on the death of his father was turned down. The writ petition has also been dismissed with the observation that the petitioner-appellant was involved in the criminal case under Section 302 I.P.C.
In view of the above involvement of the petitioner- appellant in the criminal case, learned Single Judge refused to exercise the discretionary jurisdiction. The refusal to exercise discretionary jurisdiction in such a situation cannot be faulted with.
Accordingly, we are of the opinion that the special appeal has no merit and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 25.2.2019 Prakhar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sharad Srivastava vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Akhilesh Kumar Singh Ram Ji Yadav