Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Shankar Murthy vs Hanumappa And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|09 December, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARAYANA SWAMY & SMT. B.V. VIDYULATHA, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 5414/2017 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.4664/2017) BETWEEN Shankar Murthy S/o Siddappa, Aged about 35 years, r/o Tippanahally, Ananthapur District - 515767. Now r/o 1st Cross, Kelagote, Chitradurga – 577 501. ... Appellant (By Sri Shankar Goud G., Advocate) AND 1. Hanumappa S/o Kullappadambal, Aged about 47 years, Owner of Tata Ace bearing Reg.No.KA-37/A-1880, r/o House No.1/7/633, Ward No.23, Gandhinagar, Near Korlamma temple, Koppal District, Koppal – 583227.
2. The Branch Manager, Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office 3rd Floor, ‘S’ Corner Building Opposite Bowring and Lady Corzon Hospital, Shivajinagar, Bangalore – 560 001. ... Respondents (By Sri B.C. Shivannegowda, Advocate for R-2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 28.01.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO. 98/2015 ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. MACT-V, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALATH, AFTER BEING REFERRED BY THE COURT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.
CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel for the claimant-appellant and the learned Counsel for the respondent – Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. along with its representative are present.
2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. The appellant - Claimant has agreed to receive and the Respondent – Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump sum of Rs. 3,60,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Sixty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. A joint Memo is filed on behalf of the parties to this effect.
3. The Respondent – Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.
4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Tribunal.
5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.
Sd/- JUDGE Mkm Sd/- MEMBER
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shankar Murthy vs Hanumappa And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
09 December, 2017
Judges
  • L Narayana Swamy