Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Shamsher Rawat And 5 Ors. vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 January, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
The present application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking bail in FIR No.9 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 326, 504, 506, 34 IPC, Police Station Patranga, District Ayodhya/Faizabad.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that co-accused, having similar role, has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 5.1.2021 in Bail No.9246 of 2020. He, therefore, prays that accused-applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity.
Mr.Atul Singh, learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but not disputed the aforesaid facts.
Considering the fact that co-accused, having similar role, has been granted bail by this Court, it would be appropriate to enlarge the accused-applicants on bail.
Let applicants Shamsher Rawat, Sukhram @ Sukkhey, Khushi Ram Rawat @ Julme, Ratnesh Rawat @ Lallan, Pradeep Rawat and Desh Raj be released on bail in the above case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicants misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against them in accordance with law.
The party may file self attested computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and the concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 25.1.2021 Rao/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shamsher Rawat And 5 Ors. vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 January, 2021
Judges
  • Dinesh Kumar Singh