Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Shamshad vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10525 of 2016 Applicant :- Shamshad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Hasan Shaukat Abidi,Amardeep Gaur,Mohd Aadil Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
Heard Sri S.H.S Abidi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Jitendra Singh, learned AGA for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that the present bail application has become infructuous as the trial has been concluded by the trial court.
The present bail application is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 29.3.2018 Gaurav
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shamshad vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 March, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Syed Hasan Shaukat Abidi Amardeep Gaur Mohd Aadil Siddiqui

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.