Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Shalu And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 46
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15070 of 2019 Petitioner :- Smt. Shalu And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhiraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Dhiraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ashish Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel.
The petitioners have stated in the writ petition that they have got married and there is threat to their lives. Thus, they sought protection from this Court.
Sri Sunil Kumar Mishra, Advocate states that he is representing first wife of petitioner no. 2 whose name is Indu. He contends that she is not made a party and the petitioners have not come up with clean hands inasmuch as, petitioner no. 2 has stated in the writ petition that this is his first marriage, whereas this is his second marriage. This material fact has not been disclosed by the petitioners.
Being confronted with the aforesaid fact, learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions of his client states that this is the second marriage of petitioner no. 2.
Since, the petitioners have not come up with clean hands and has tried to mislead the Court to obtain order in favour of the petitioners, therefore, it is a fit case for imposing a cost of Rs.10,000/- upon the petitioners which shall be deposited the with the Legal Services Authority.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.4.2019 Ishan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Shalu And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2019
Judges
  • Saral Srivastava
Advocates
  • Dhiraj Kumar Pandey