Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Shalu @ Aditya vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 61
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45343 of 2018 Applicant :- Shalu @ Aditya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed by the applicant Shalu @ Aditya seeking bail in Case Crime No. 787 of 2017, under Sections 323, 504, 324, 325, 307 IPC, Police Station Saurikh, District Kannauj.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that even according to the prosecution own case, in the F.I.R. only the role of abusing the first informant has been assigned to the applicant and no role of causing any injury has been assigned to the applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that the applicant has no criminal history to his credit and he is in jail since 01.10.2018 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no chance of applicant fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses.
Per contra, learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact and that the applicant is in jail since 01.10.2018.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let the applicant Shalu @ Aditya be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 29.11.2018 Ashok Gupta
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shalu @ Aditya vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2018
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Rajeev Upadhyay