Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Shalini Mittal And Another vs Additional District Judge-

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 30
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5112 of 2018 Petitioner :- Smt. Shalini Mittal And Another Respondent :- Additional District Judge-14, Bulandshahr And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Uma Nath Pandey,Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Dharmendra Vaish
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Sri Uma Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners states that pursuant to the order passed by this Court in Contempt Application (Civil) No. 3773 of 2018, Smt. Shalini Mittal and another Vs. Shri Praveen Kumar Jain, Additional District Judge and 3 others, vacant possession has already been handed over to the petitioners on 7.8.2018 and as such the present petition has become infructuous.
Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent - Bank has filed the affidavit of Chief Manager of the Bank, which is taken on record wherein he has admitted the aforesaid position.
Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.8.2018 p.s.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Shalini Mittal And Another vs Additional District Judge-

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 August, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Birla
Advocates
  • Uma Nath Pandey Pradeep Kumar