Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Shakuntla Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 September, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Shri Jayshanker Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner is present.
Shri Hari Om Pandey, Advocate has filed his power on behalf of respondent no.5. The same is taken on record.
Notice on behalf of respondent nos.1 to 4 has been accepted by Shri Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.
Shri Hari Om Pandey has stated that a false averment has been made in paragraph 27 of the writ petition that the petitioner is working on the post in question. He has submitted that the respondent no.5 has joined on the post in question about two months back and her signatures have also been attested by respondent no.4 herein.
As prayed, list this case on 21.9.2021 as fresh.
Order Date :- 17.9.2021 Anupam
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shakuntla Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 September, 2021
Judges
  • Rakesh Srivastava