Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Shaik Meharaj vs The State Of Karnataka

High Court Of Karnataka|14 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. N. PHANEENDRA CRL.P. NO. 7247/2018 BETWEEN SHAIK MEHARAJ S/O. SHAIK MODDINA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT. NO. E 240 BEHIND PRAJWAI CLINIC FARIDA SHOE FACTORY GOVINDAPURA BENGALURU – 560 045 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED KHALEEL PASHA., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY. R.T.NAGAR POLICE STATION BENGALURU REP. BY S.P.P HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU – 560 001 … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ROHITH B.J., HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CR.NO.15/2016 (C.C.NO.12001/2016) OF R.T. NAGAR P.S., BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/Ss. 143, 147, 148, 341, 114, 302, 307 R/W 149 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The matter having been passed over in the Morning Session, when called in the Afternoon Session, neither the petitioner nor his counsel present before the court.
The order sheet discloses that, four opportunities have been granted to comply with the office objections. But, so far the office objections have not been complied with. This indicates that, the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE KGR*
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shaik Meharaj vs The State Of Karnataka

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
14 October, 2019
Judges
  • K N Phaneendra