Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Shaik Ibrahim vs The Secretary To The Government

High Court Of Telangana|09 June, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TEN :PRESENT:
Between:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO : 14543 of 2010 Shaik Ibrahim S/o. Shaijk Hussain R/o. D/No. 10-5-2/1/3/5/A Mallepally Village, Asifnagar Mandal, Hyderabad . Petitioner AND
1 The Secretary to the Government Revenue ( Assignment -I ) Department Secretariat Buildings, hyderabad
2 The District Collector Hyderabad . Respondents WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through his Advocate Sri P. Gopal Das, presented this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent in issuing the impugned Memo No. R1/1586/2008, dated 13.05.2010 demanding the petitioner to pay Rs. 4,79,063/- towards regularization charges for regularizing the petitioner land to an extent of 70 sq. yds., situated at D/No. 10-5-2/1/3/5/A, Mallepally Village, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against G.O.Ms.No. 166 Revenue ( Assn. POT) Department , dated 16.02.2008 and consequentially direct the second respondent to reduce the amount towards regularization charges for regularizing the petitioner land to an extent of 70 sq. yds., situated at D/No. 10-5-2/1/3/5/A, Mallepally Village, as per the market value informed by the Sub-Registrar, Golconda Vide Letter No. 250 /SRO/GO1/2010, dated 18.10.2010 fixed market value of Rs. 4,900/- per square yard without adding 25% surcharge .
AND WHEREAS the High Court upon hearing the arguments of Sri P. .Gopal Das, Advocate for the Petitioner and of G.P. for Revenue for the Respondents directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause why this writ petition should not be admitted in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed in Writ Petition.
You viz ;
1 The Secretary to the Government Revenue ( Assignment -I ) Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad
2 The District Collector Hyderabad are directed to show cause as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this writ petition should not be admitted.
Note: Post after two weeks.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
1 The Secretary to the Government Revenue ( Assignment -I ) Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad
2 The District Collector Hyderabad.
( Nos. 1 & 2 BY RPAD along with petition and affidavit ).
3. 1 c.c. to Sri P. .Gopal Das, Advocate (OPUC).
4. Two CCs to the G.P.for Revenue , High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT)
5. 1 spare copy. Ags Ags Dt: 30/06/2010 HIGH COURT SK J Dt: 25/06/2010 NOTE: POST AFTER TWO WEEKS NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION W.P. NO. 14543 of 2010
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shaik Ibrahim vs The Secretary To The Government

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
09 June, 2014
Judges
  • Sanjay Kumar