HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.25557 of 2006
Date: August 04, 2014
Between:
1. Shaik Baji Shaheed & 2 others.
… Petitioners And The Vijayawada Guntur Tenali Mangalgiri Urban Development Authority, rep. by its Vice Chairman, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
… Respondent * * * HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.25557 of 2006
O R D E R:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel for the respondent.
2. The first petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.0.37 cents of land in Mangalagiri Town, Guntur District. The said land was gifted by the father of the petitioner. The father originally gifted an extent of Ac.0.48 cents out of which an extent of Ac.0.11 cents was sold to some third party. There is an old residential house bearing Door No.1-730/27 and another house bearing Door No.1-730/29 which was constructed by the 3rd petitioner in the land of the first petitioner with his consent. The 2nd petitioner is the brother of the first petitioner and he is the owner of an extent of Ac.0.48 cents having gifted to him by the original owner under a registered Document No.1647/1968 dated 16.07.1968. He is residing in an old residential house bearing Door No.1-730/30. While so, the respondent wanted to expand the Amaravathi Township and in that connection they visited the land on 02nd December 2006 and conducted a survey and put markings also on the building and orally informed the petitioners to vacate the premises and hand over possession of the land to them within ten days. Before taking such action, the respondent has not issued any notice. In those circumstances, the writ petition was filed.
3. This Court, by order dated 07.12.2006, ordered status quo be maintained and the said order has been continuing till today.
4. The learned standing counsel for the respondent submits that so far the possession of the land was not taken and in the event of taking any part of the property for public purpose, they will follow due process of law.
5. Recording the said submission of the learned standing counsel for the respondent, the writ petition is closed, as nothing survives for adjudication for the time being. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed in consequence. No costs.
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J Date: August 04, 2014 BSB
2 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.25557 of 2006
Date: August 04, 2014
BSB