Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30510 of 2019 Applicant :- Shahrukh @ Shahzad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Raghubir Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
Heard Sri Raghubir Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri G.P. Singh, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that there was quarrel going on between the children. The applicant is said to have fired at the injured who received pellet injuries which are simple in nature.
Learned A.G.A. have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the fire-arm injury was caused by the applicant to the injured who received pellet injuries on his person which are five in number for which X-Ray was advised which has not been annexed.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the submission advanced, the nature and gravity of the accusation, I find no good ground for grant of bail to the applicant Shahrukh, involved in Case Crime No.36 of 2019, u/s 307 IPC, P.S. Mantola, district Agra.
Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected.
However, the applicant is at liberty to move bail application u/s 439 Cr.P.C., if so advised.
Order Date :- 30.7.2019 Gaurav