Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Shahida Ibrahim vs The Commissioner And Others

Madras High Court|18 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

M. DHANDAPANI, J.
nl/nvi When this matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
Index :Yes/No nl/nvi To
1. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai – 600 003.
2. The Asst. Revenue Officer, Revenue Department, Zone-VIII, Corporation of Chennai, 64, N.S.K.Salai, Chennai – 600 024.
http://www.judis.nic.in 18.09.2017 W.P.No.30158 of 2004
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Shahida Ibrahim vs The Commissioner And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
18 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Dhandapani